A Sonoran Truth Editorial, August 28, 2017.
Why would Don Sorchych write about Queen Carrie Dyrek and 9/11 in the same editorial? Is Don subconsciously telling us something?
Don cites to Dr. Judy Wood’s e-Book on 9/11, Where Did the Towers Go?
Lots of websites to explore on this:
This looks pretty wacko:
There is no question that jet fuel cannot bring down a high-rise building, nor would a plane crashing into a high-rise cause it to collapse at free-fall rate of gravity right into its footprint. The “official story” is a fairy tale that only proves the gullibility of Americans.
But it’s best to apply Occam ’s razor before believing wild weapons were used to steal Billions, kill thousands and wipe out three skyscrapers (the Twin Towers and Building 7). Occam’s razor is a problem-solving principle. It states that among competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected. The hypothesis with the fewest assumptions about 9/11 is controlled demolition. Marvin Bush, brother of President Bush was involved in the security of the Twin Towers. Deep Throat said “Follow the money.”
Certain key unknown figures in the Federal Reserve may have ‘conspired’ with key unknown figures at the Bank of New York to create a situation where $240 billion in off balance sheet securities created in 1991 as part of an official covert operation to overthrow the Soviet Union, could be cleared without publicly acknowledging their existence.
In other words, what happened on 9/11 is as old as empire itself. Applying Occam ’s razor to Cave Creek, we ask: Why did Don write about his Queen Carrie and 9/11 in the same column? Why would Don tell us about his “millionaire friend and billionaire boss who were guilty of serious crime that were never prosecuted because a lawyer knew how to rig the legal system?